The Land Acquisition Bill – Fact Sheet , that aims at
understanding the Bill in detail and in a manner that layman can understand is
an initiative by the BEST COMPANY REAL ESTATE industry consists of.
In this concluding part, the Part 3 let us have a look at some more
features, the criticism and most importantly the pros and cons in a nutshell.
Dholera SIR |
What is public
purpose for land acquisition: Strategic use by the armed forces, paramilitary,
state police; for national security; for infrastructure projects, including
activities listed under the department of economic affairs (infrastructure
section), excluding private hospitals, private education institutions and
private hotels; projects related to industrial corridors, mining, national
investment and manufacturing zone, sports, healthcare, tourism and space
programmes; housing projects for income groups specified by government,
projects planned for development of village sites, residential areas for lower
income groups in urban areas; projects involving agro-processing, warehousing,
cold storage, marketing infrastructure, dairy, fisheries and meat processing
cooperatives
Pre-condition for
acquiring: For a private entity or a PPP project, state has to conduct
a social impact assessment (SIA) and an environmental impact assessment (EIA),
to identify the families who would be affected if land was acquired.
The private entity seeking land must then get the consent of 80 per cent of the affected families before it gets the government to acquire land for it. In the case of PPPs, the entity has to secure consent of 70 per cent of affected families. The third condition for getting possession of land acquired through state intervention is payment of compensation and fulfilling of R&R requirements.
The private entity seeking land must then get the consent of 80 per cent of the affected families before it gets the government to acquire land for it. In the case of PPPs, the entity has to secure consent of 70 per cent of affected families. The third condition for getting possession of land acquired through state intervention is payment of compensation and fulfilling of R&R requirements.
Lease option: The
Bill allows industry to take land on lease, instead of buying. But the decision
rests with the state rather than the landowner
Problematic clauses: No
guarantee of jobs in R&R package; compensation calculated according to
circle rates much less than market prices; no protection to farmland; state
government to decide if unused acquired-land should be returned to the farmer
or added to its land bank. This applies even if owners return the compensation
Pros:
1.
This is an improvement upon the original act, since
if the majority of the landowners do not agree to the project to be established
on their land, a majority of them can unite and oppose the project by not
giving their consent.
2. There is an improvement upon the
original act which did not provide any kind of compensation
(monetary/non-monetary) to those affected by the land acquisition process. This
bill makes a start, compensating those who will be affected by land acquisition
prior to the setting up of the infrastructure or development project,
monetarily and in some cases, non-monetarily.
3. Under the Land Acquisition Act (1894),
again no provision was there for rehabilitating or resettlement of those who
would be losing their ownership of land or livelihoods associated with the land
acquired for any project.
Cons:
1. If a private project developer wants
to escape this clause, he/she will take land in multiple parcels instead of
one-time acquisition, which helps him or her escape the application of this
Act.
2.
A large
amount of land is acquired even today by public sector units like NTPC, BHEL or
others. Yet, no public consent is required by public
sector units in acquiring land, be it for mining, for power projects,
for highway building or for any other purpose. This is still a failure of this
act and the demand of those protesting against the previous act has still not
been met in totality.
3.
There is no making of the provisions as mandatory,
and the project developer can say that he/she is not in a position to do so
with reasons, the project developer is not mandated really to provide these
provisions.
Like in
everything, this also has its fair share of Pros and Cons, the application over
the years and the cases that follow will judge the failure and success ratio of
it. For more such useful updates on REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT PROPERTY, keep watching this space.
No comments:
Post a Comment